On 8/30/26 10:00 am, Marcus Daniels wrote:
Agreed-upon -> model that makes predictions that can be observed and
repeated.
No human social system need be involved in that.
https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/08/anthropics-new-hardware-standard-lets-ai-agents-control-the-physical-world/
shared by whom, repeated by whom, and how are predictions compared and
verified and by what principles?
<ducking incoming shoes>
But as I hope I conceded to EricS, I *can* invert the whole thing and
(by faith) declare objectivity to be the fundament and everything else
rubbings and shadows and derived therefrom. This is where my earliest
linguistic training by my parents and peers steers me, not to mention a
modest education in scientific and generally western thought and a
lifetime of practice.
So why invert it as I have (contingently? provocatively?)
<more shoes>
.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ...
--- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
