Richard Fateman wrote: >> Since FriCAS can run in (for example) SBCL, and Maxima can be >> loaded in to SBCL, (running in the Common Lisp :Maxima package), >> why not have them co-exist? A FriCAS type/category/domain could be >> Maxima-Expression. > ... >> Alternatively, one could perhaps use Maxima as the main command processor >> with calls to FriCAS routines as appropriate (e.g. better symbolic >> integration?) > > Yes, and vice versa, FriCAS can call Maxima routines (e.g. better > numeric integration). >
-1 I am rather strongly against this suggestion. Interoperability of these programs is already provided by systems like Sage. It seems to me that the strength of systems like FriCAS is specifically in inventing new wheels not avoiding same. Bill Page. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to fricas-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
