Hello, Personally I have no objection to this removal. I don't even know if it is used and as you said it seems useless.
Greg Le sam. 17 janv. 2026, 00:08, Waldek Hebisch <[email protected]> a écrit : > I tried to provide replacement IndexCard using data from > BrowserInformation. My current version misses important parts, > but I think that I can provide good replacement. > > However, current IndexCard has: > > coerce : String -> % > ++ coerce(s) converts \spad{s} into an \spad{IndexCard}. Warning: if > ++ \spad{s} is not of the right format then an error will occur when > using > ++ it. > > This signature exposes internal representation and is incompatible > with replacement. But AFAICS it is also essentially useless: > argument string must be in database format, otherwise it would > not work. So I think that we should remove this signature. > > Opinions? > > -- > Waldek Hebisch > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/aWrE756BtD9avhdb%40fricas.org > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/CAHnU2dZY-hQKUWTB5qFvu2_Dj6nUe%3DZDAu2a0ozBSC_dXeEGWg%40mail.gmail.com.
