If I remember correctly IndexCard was a simple, throw-away demo. On Sunday, January 18, 2026 at 3:06:15 PM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote:
> Hello, > > Personally I have no objection to this removal. I don't even know if it is > used and as you said it seems useless. > > Greg > > > Le sam. 17 janv. 2026, 00:08, Waldek Hebisch <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> I tried to provide replacement IndexCard using data from >> BrowserInformation. My current version misses important parts, >> but I think that I can provide good replacement. >> >> However, current IndexCard has: >> >> coerce : String -> % >> ++ coerce(s) converts \spad{s} into an \spad{IndexCard}. Warning: >> if >> ++ \spad{s} is not of the right format then an error will occur >> when using >> ++ it. >> >> This signature exposes internal representation and is incompatible >> with replacement. But AFAICS it is also essentially useless: >> argument string must be in database format, otherwise it would >> not work. So I think that we should remove this signature. >> >> Opinions? >> >> -- >> Waldek Hebisch >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/aWrE756BtD9avhdb%40fricas.org >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/f84442a9-af9e-45dc-8624-8456a18cf4c2n%40googlegroups.com.
