Miklos Vajna wrote:
I wonder - in what circumstances would a bug delay a Frugalware
release? I worry that Frugalware is released with some noticeable,
easily-fixed bugs, when it may look better if these are resolved
before release. My time for Frugalware is limited so I can't put up
my hand to help here, so anyone's free to tell me to go somewhere
else. :)
[snap]
Of course both methods can result in a high quality product. In case of
Frugalware, you can always know when do you get the release, but the
"what" is usually decided in the last minute of "before freeze". ;)
In short: don't worry, we'll have the feature freeze after rc2 to fix as
many bugs as time permits.
Well, i think the 1week freeze period is not enough. Not enough to test
all the isos, most of the possible cases on as much hw as possible. As i
said several times earlier, we should do a feature freeze after rc1 and
pushing only really needed things, which is tested before pushing. As i
don't maintain too much packages i think i don't have too much right to
decide what to do, these are only offers. I'm just talking about my
opinions i got using Frugal in every day usage. Please think about this
a little bit. 1 week is not enough for a test period, creating iso,
testing them and waiting for mirrors.
Regards,
IroNiQ
--
Member of Frugalware Developer Team
Web: http://www.ironiq.hu
LinuxCounter: #331532
_______________________________________________
Frugalware-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
