On 17 August 2010 20:18, Miklos Vajna <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 07:56:56PM +1000, Russell Dickenson > <[email protected]> wrote: >> But you d'boss!? > > Given that we're not a company we have to choose between: > > - we have a set of features and we work on those in our free time and > when they're ready, we release it or > > - we have a set of release dates and based on what is ready till the > deadline, we release that. > > So far we followed the second rule. This is mainly about features, but > we have a timeframe for bugfixes as well. > > To sum up: no, I don't want to extend deadlines as that way we'll be in > the "no fixed set of features and no fixed deadlines" category. > > (I'm already working on manually fixing up failed builds, if we accept > patches causing a release bumps again, I may start the fixup work from > the begining again.)
VMiklos, Sorry but that was intended as a joke. I forgot to insert an appropriate emoticon. I agree with the current approach of timed releases because it makes it easier for everyone to schedule their work. May you always be Frugal, Russell Dickenson (AKA phayz) _______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list [email protected] http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
