----- "Miklos Vajna" <[email protected]> a écrit : > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 07:51:14AM +1000, Russell Dickenson > <[email protected]> wrote: > > No problem. I know that we have sometimes had to ask contributors > to provide patches, not submit FrugalBuilds attachments. Also some > > contributions have been forgotten, as sometimes happens to email > > messages. Untimately though I would not be using any review system > (as > > I don't submit FrugalBuilds, nor review them) so I'm happy to leave > > the decision to yourselves.
I used to submit FrugalBuilds as attachments, at a very chaotic rate, so Miklos asked me to send patches instead of attachments. When I've submitted FrugalBuilds in the past, I often used to check if the patch was included or rejected in releases (and was proud if they were, of course). But my contribution is only less than two dozens of Frugalbuild so it's easy for me without needing a solution for that. Next patch will be the little game Regards > > Ah, if you were willing to solve the "track patches from the list > somewhere, so they don't get lost" problem, patchwork may be a far > better solution for us: > > http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/patchwork/ > > _______________________________________________ > Frugalware-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel _______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list [email protected] http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
