On 9 September 2010 22:07, <[email protected]> wrote: > > ----- "Miklos Vajna" <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 07:51:14AM +1000, Russell Dickenson >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > No problem. I know that we have sometimes had to ask contributors >> to provide patches, not submit FrugalBuilds attachments. Also some >> > contributions have been forgotten, as sometimes happens to email >> > messages. Untimately though I would not be using any review system >> (as >> > I don't submit FrugalBuilds, nor review them) so I'm happy to leave >> > the decision to yourselves. > > I used to submit FrugalBuilds as attachments, at a very chaotic rate, so > Miklos asked me to send patches instead of attachments. > > When I've submitted FrugalBuilds in the past, I often used to check if the > patch was > included or rejected in releases (and was proud if they were, of course). > But my contribution is only less than two dozens of Frugalbuild so it's easy > for me without needing a solution for that. > > Next patch will be the little game > > Regards > >> >> Ah, if you were willing to solve the "track patches from the list >> somewhere, so they don't get lost" problem, patchwork may be a far >> better solution for us: >> >> http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/patchwork/
Sorry for the very late reply. I have looked at the patchwork home page etc and it looks great! It's a nice, simple solution for the sort of requirements that we have. Is this something I could install and test on an official Frugalware server? May you always be Frugal, Russell Dickenson (AKA phayz) _______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list [email protected] http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
