On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Melko <[email protected]> wrote: > 2012/2/28 James Buren <[email protected]> >> >> After difficulties we had during 1.6 release cycle, I am proposing a rule >> addition. In addition to the freeze we do from rc2 -> stable, >> I am proposing we do a new feature and major bump freeze on everything >> that is not in a -extra group as its main group after we >> are past the pre2 release of a release cycle. The way I feel is, major >> changes in the main groups should be implemented by the >> time we have pre2 released. This gives us a 2 month period instead of a >> mere two weeks to resolve outstanding issues with the >> main branch. I don't wish to apply this to anything in extra, as that has >> few important packages, and is way too massive for us >> to do any real quality control on. Thoughts? > > > isn't pre2->stable too much time? > Freezing base from rc1 seems reasonable to me, and we still would have one > month...
Melko does have a point. I think it will do. > _______________________________________________ > Frugalware-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel > _______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list [email protected] http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
