Antlr has an openjdk version and I'm planning on removing gcj anyway so ...
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Elentir <[email protected]> wrote: > Le Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:50:49 +0200, > Miklos Vajna <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:06:44AM +0200, Miklos Vajna >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Unless I hear objections, I would like to remove these on arm to >> > speed up the gcc build. >> >> I did these now in ryuotesting8, overall build time is 202 minutes >> here (without any out of memory ans similar failure), quite an >> improvement. ;-) > > Nice ;). As long as we don't need these, I see no objections to this. > I usually build gcc on my trimslice, this is quite faster (some hours > at most ;). Did you try to disable only java ? I think the ada, fortran > and objc time to build is negligible. > > I take a quick look at my commits a year ago, the reason why I ported > java-gcj-compat is due to the following dependency chain : gcc-gcj > have antlr as makedepends and antlr needs java-gcj-compat. > When I build the first frugalware gcc arm package, I build it with java > support in case it turns out to be usefull. I wanted to avoid tricky > stuff in the future if I needed it. > > _______________________________________________ > Frugalware-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel _______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list [email protected] http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
