Even though it's probably a bit large and complicated I think NM is the best solution here by far.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Miklos Vajna <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 09:51:00PM -0700, James Buren <[email protected]> wrote: >> It is time to get serious about considering a netconfig replacement. >> I will likely write a new frontend for it, but I want to replace the daemon >> backend with something we don't maintain. I am writing this to request >> suggestions on what backend to use, as there are multiple. Here's a list >> of what I know of: >> >> wicd (some what popular, uses its own python UIs) >> >> networkmanager (very common, usually integrated with our DEs) >> >> connman (originates from mobile linux and lacks GUIs) > > If I understand your point, the motivation behind getting rid of > netconfig is the benefit of not maintaining something inside Frugalware, > just using the mainstream solution everybody else does. > > If that's indeed the case, I would vote for NM, the rest is just as > custom software as netconfig. > > _______________________________________________ > Frugalware-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel > _______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list [email protected] http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
