On Fri, March 22, 2013 10:30 am, Sebastien VINCENT wrote: > Le 22/03/2013 10:25, Marius Cirsta a écrit : >> Even though it's probably a bit large and complicated I think NM is >> the best solution here by far. >> >> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Miklos Vajna <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 09:51:00PM -0700, James Buren <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> It is time to get serious about considering a netconfig replacement. >>>> I will likely write a new frontend for it, but I want to replace the >>>> daemon >>>> backend with something we don't maintain. I am writing this to request >>>> suggestions on what backend to use, as there are multiple. Here's a >>>> list >>>> of what I know of: >>>> >>>> wicd (some what popular, uses its own python UIs) >>>> >>>> networkmanager (very common, usually integrated with our DEs) >>>> >>>> connman (originates from mobile linux and lacks GUIs) >>> If I understand your point, the motivation behind getting rid of >>> netconfig is the benefit of not maintaining something inside >>> Frugalware, >>> just using the mainstream solution everybody else does. >>> >>> If that's indeed the case, I would vote for NM, the rest is just as >>> custom software as netconfig. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Frugalware-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Frugalware-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel > +1 for NM :) > > -- > Sébastien VINCENT Aka Baste > > _______________________________________________ > Frugalware-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel > I agree with that too.
Regards, Pingax _______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list [email protected] http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
