Bryan Baldwin <[email protected]> writes: > On 08/05/2012 12:27 PM, Ben Finney wrote: > > Sometimes the name “Debian” is used colloquially to refer to the > > Debian project, and the name “GNU” is used colloquially to refer to > > the GNU project. I think we agree that those uses, while they are > > usually clear enough, do frequently cause unfortunate confusion such > > as exhibited in this thread.
[…] > > Yes. Hopefully we all can continue to work on resolving that here > > in this forum. > > There is no confusion here. The difference between Debian and the > Debian Project is completely immaterial to either being considered > freedom respecting. Debian is 100% free; all of its parts are free software, or are subject to removal from Debian on that basis alone. The Debian project is composed of people; many of those people work on producing non-free software, and no-one has promised they will abstain From that. This does not affect whether Debian is free. > Debian "the system", allegedly 100% free, was not suddenly discovered > to our shock and amazement to share the name Debian with another > completely autonomous developement movement who just so happened to be > engaged in making nonfree software packages […] Just as GNU, which is an operating system, was not suddenly discovered to share a name with a project which produces website articles and so on, tightly related to GNU and served from the same servers, under non-free “you may not modify this” terms. That does not affect the fact that GNU is free, because those things are not part of GNU. > So then you say, that over there, that's not part of us. No, that's not what is said. It doesn't even make sense, as you're conflating a bunch of bits (“that over there”) with a group of people (“us”). This is exactly the confusion I'm pointing out. GNU is not people, and Debian is not people. Both those names refer to operating systems. It is unreasonable to call GNU or Debian non-free based on the totality of all things produced by the GNU project or the Debian project. Of course, the GNU project is often called GNU, and the Debian project is often called Debian, but that's usually in awareness of the risk of exactly this kind of confusion. To think of them as the same thing leads to nonsense like “you say, that over there, that's not part of us”. You're confusing software with the people who produce or maintain it. If we can talk about Debian as defined by the Debian project, and about GNU as defined by the GNU project, this confusion is cleared up. -- \ “When people believe that they have absolute knowledge, with no | `\ test in reality, this [the Auschwitz crematorium] is how they | _o__) behave.” —Jacob Bronowski, _The Ascent of Man_, 1973 | Ben Finney
pgpAMDqDfkWxO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fsf-collab-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/fsf-collab-discuss
