MJ Ray wrote: > (Hi Matt-Kibo!) And it's utter nonsense, which has killed at least two > attempts to give GNU equal billing with Linux in group names. Is this > to stop existing groups keeping their acronyms and domains? They have > sinned! They must pay a penalty! Do more marketing work! > > It doesn't much matter what the group is called, whether it's a LUG or > a FUG or a WUG - it matters what it *does* yet there seems to be no > plan to verify that listed GLUGs actually help free software. It > looks like all dictionary lawyerism and no practical standards, > similar to the horrendous "Social Enterprise" mistakes. There are > lots of very helpful free software groups listed on www.lug.org.uk > > Anyway, that wasn't what I was getting at - I was describing the usual > rationale for those conditions, which claimed that linking is > necessarily a form of approval, rather than simply cataloguing.
I hereby invoke Godwin's law by referring to myself as a nazi and comparing my own actions to those of Hitler. Now, let's get back on to discussing the iPlayer. matt _______________________________________________ Fsfe-uk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk
