On 10/01/2008, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Dave Crossland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This sounds like a general endorsement that applies the Open Font > > License's weak copyleft, which I hope to start a discussion about on > > the OFL list shortly and look forward to your contributions there, MJ > > :-) > > I don't think I've ever complained about OFL's weak copyleft.
Sure - and now you've made a good case for when weak (ie, very simple and unburdensome) copyleft is appropriate in general, that applies to fonts and is implemented by the OFL. Which is good to hear :-) > It was the supertrademark clause which was the main trouble. I'd welcome your thoughts on the trademark part of the "additional terms" of GPLv3. -- Regards, Dave _______________________________________________ Fsfe-uk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk
