On Monday 02 March 2009 16:31:03 Sam Liddicott wrote: > I suggest one slight alternative; > > Those who have since resigned may have done so on the understanding that > the intervening years did actually happen and that the AFFS was in fact > non-operational. > > It might be easier to reboot the AFFS if those members whose resignation > was not processed by the AFFS could claim that their resigniation was a > misunderstanding due to them not being aware of the fiction that would > now be perpetrated, and thus retain their membership. > > It might be easier to reboot with a larger membership; and there is a > cause to argue that those who cancelled were actually more aware of what > was going on than those who didn't. > > But I was never a member....
Exactly so! May I ask when you joined this mailing list? I do not seem to recall seeing a post from you on it before. -- John Seago GNU/Linux Registered User No. #219566 http://counter.li.org/ _______________________________________________ Fsfe-uk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk
