I'm not so sure that FWSM runs PIXOS, but with all that interfaces think about the rules managment nighmare.
-----Mensagem original----- De: Michael Holstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada: qua 28-09-2005 16:56 Para: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk Cc: Assunto: Re: [Full-disclosure] Suggestion for IDS > If you NAT a lot, PIX can't handle the load. It also isn't flexible > enough. Huh? .. the FWSM (which is PIX and you can have 4 of them in a chassis) can handle 100 intefaces, 5gpbs, 100k CPS, and 1M concurrent per blade. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2706/ps4452/ Show me an OpenBSD system that can handle 400 interfaces, 20gbps, and 4M connections (and can do HSRP, etc). (I'm not trying to start an open-source "holy war" on a newsgrop .. I use pf too, where I need the granularity -- just not on the whole network). ~Mike. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/