If the US spent 1/10th of the time and money on preventing something like drink driving, it'd be saving tens of thousands of more lives, net. Put it into proprtion. Terrorism is not an issue, but it's foreign policy is.

On 12/20/05, TJ < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, there is always more than one side to every story.

And, yes - everyone has a right to *peaceable* nuclear power.  *Peaceable*
being the key word there ... as for saying "Good for the goose, good for the
gander" - NO; when people are killing innocents they deserve to not have the
chance to continue.

I'm sorry - has Bush ever said he wanted to wipe Iran off the map?
I doubt it.

Actually no, I am pretty comfortable with the situation IN the US - I am
apparently arguing with those who would rather have more innocent Americans
die and have more nuclear-capable terrorists.

It has nothing to do with getting the last word - I was going to let it
drop, until someone called me "weak".  A stinging insult indeed!


If you cared about more than spreading garbage, you'd take the high-road and
take this "discussion" offlist ... like others have correctly done.


No further on-list comments.
/TJ ... sorry to have added to this thread even more, I hate feeding trolls.


-----Original Message-----
From: Byron Sonne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 5:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; Full-Disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] An uncontrolled ***OFFTOPIC*** thread ...
America's future under George Bush

> And - about permitting Iran to develop nuclear power "because the US is a
> bully" ... WTF?

More than one side to the story, homes... everyone has the right to
peacable nuclear power. Even if they did develop nukes, it's in their
right. If the USA, Russia + satellite states, France, UK, India,
Pakistan and Israel are allowed to do it, why not anyone else? Good for
the goose, good for the gander.

The USA failed to lead by example, and are now reaping the rewards.

> You are talking about Iran, a nation whose leader is
> delusional and has voiced support of destroying another nation outright.

Susbistute 'USA' for 'Iran' and the sentence sounds like the same crap
other people say about the USA. You sound just like the jerks that your
troops are allegedly fighting against. Ever consider there's some brown
skinned dude in a turban thinking almost the same kind of thoughts as
you, except it's about America instead?

The USA has made it's bed, and now you're finding it uncomfortable to
sleep in? Haha.

> You may disagree with my position, and that is "fine" ... but this forum
is
> not the correct place to debate the issue - can we please let this list
> return to topic now?

So as long as you get your last word in, everyone has to shut up? Feh.
Weak dude.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Reply via email to