On 6/12/06, c0ntex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/06/06, David Loyall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, I've CC'd [EMAIL PROTECTED], but if someone else would give them a proper
> write-up, and encourage them to close the hole, that'd be wonderful.
I know this guy who has over 7 years of direct security influence with
Yahoo and Google security engineers!
You know that you really should have replied from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
attached a .shm or a .scr, right? I would definatly open any
attachment sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] in a heartbeat.
Really though, that's some crappy static code. It reminds me of a 1st
year programmer that replicates their same call 100 times to get 1
thing done.
I'm not quite sure how people still fall for these things... be it a
executable attachment or html, that low and behold CAN have javascript
(AJAX/Web 2.0TM) in it, you should not be just opening any
attachments.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
