Due to this RDV called email I suggest the following patch:
procmail || ${insert other filter here}
This work around will allow you to avoid the n3td3v RDV shenanigans.
Thank you.
On 9/28/07, Jimby Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I asked you to stop your bullshit you mad man. It is crazy to see so
> many anonymous IDs talking to each other and spamming the whole list.
>
> On 9/28/07, worried security <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/28/07, Troy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Wouldn't UDV be more appropriate, for unpatched disclosed vulnerability?
> > The "R" in RDV means recent. I wouldn't consider a two-month old, but still
> > unpatched, vulnerability to be recent, so I wouldn't really be able to call
> > it an RDV. I would, however, be able to call it a UDV.
> > >
> > >
> > > Another option would be EDV, for exploitable disclosed vulnerability, or
> > even just UV or EV. Why do we need to bring up the point that it's
> > disclosed? How could we be discussing an undisclosed vulnerability?
> >
> >
> > Two months is still recently. Think about "In recent history we invaded
> > Iraq", "In recent times terrorism has become more prominent".
> >
> > Five, Ten years can still be classed as recently. Two months, no problem.
> >
> > Dude, I sat for hours thinking up RDV, give me some credit ;)
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter:
> > http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
