Due to this RDV called email I suggest the following patch: procmail || ${insert other filter here}
This work around will allow you to avoid the n3td3v RDV shenanigans. Thank you. On 9/28/07, Jimby Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I asked you to stop your bullshit you mad man. It is crazy to see so > many anonymous IDs talking to each other and spamming the whole list. > > On 9/28/07, worried security <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/28/07, Troy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wouldn't UDV be more appropriate, for unpatched disclosed vulnerability? > > The "R" in RDV means recent. I wouldn't consider a two-month old, but still > > unpatched, vulnerability to be recent, so I wouldn't really be able to call > > it an RDV. I would, however, be able to call it a UDV. > > > > > > > > > Another option would be EDV, for exploitable disclosed vulnerability, or > > even just UV or EV. Why do we need to bring up the point that it's > > disclosed? How could we be discussing an undisclosed vulnerability? > > > > > > Two months is still recently. Think about "In recent history we invaded > > Iraq", "In recent times terrorism has become more prominent". > > > > Five, Ten years can still be classed as recently. Two months, no problem. > > > > Dude, I sat for hours thinking up RDV, give me some credit ;) > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > > Charter: > > http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/