-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Right,
It set off alarms with all of my penetration testers hence why we're
researching it. The question I have is, has anyone seen port 31337
respond with the .NET REMOTING banner? Our nmap -A claims that it is
.NET REMOTING... just seems weird...
Anyone know of any backdoors that do that?
The Security Community wrote:
> The last time I saw anything on port 31337 (ELEET) it was during a
> vulnerability assessment. We shut it down and stopped the assessment.
> Management wouldn't let us investigate, then blew the cover on the
> assessment a week or two later.
>
> It's almost always bad, but you may just have an admin with a stupid
> sense of humor.
>
> 31337 should always throw a red flag.
>
> On 9/28/07, Simon Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Has anyone ever heard of .NET REMOTING running on port 31337? If so,
> have you ever seen it "legitimate"?
>
>
>>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
- --
- - simon
- ----------------------
http://www.snosoft.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFG/UDef3Elv1PhzXgRAjZZAJ4mwrJ0WyvGBUznwbrRu4+/JBd0owCdHcgr
aKOuZul4pgLcu4H3Aoo1HuU=
=X1Ya
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
