I really don't understand how you even think this idea has any chance of succeeding. You obviously didn't read my response properly; not only did I address issues of money, but also the fact that it would be absolutely impossible to implement such a system due to existing infrastructures and lack of records. Please read the rest of my response properly.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 5:47 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:47 AM, AaRoNg11 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A licensing system of this size would cost millions, if not billions to > implement. > > What's a few million here, a few billion there in the name of national > security? Money hasn't stopped the Department of Homeland Security > implement far more stupider things in the past. No, I don't think > money is the issue here, what the issue here is, is ironing out the > details to make this whole thing workable and effective, and getting > cross-government, cross-sector cooperation with rolling the scheme out > and it be made an industry standard that everyone is agreed upon. That > is the real challenge that faces us, not how much money its going to > cost. We can talk about the money later, let's just get the proposal > details worked out and put on the table first and see if its got a > chance for any funding. > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > -- Aaron Goulden
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
