The topic does not change much on this discussion, so if you really cared that much for the signal to noise ratio, you would have filtered the topic out - especially since you use gmail...
It seems that you are enjoying this thread since you have been following it so far, and even bothered responding to the thread. I myself am not enjoying the thread, I respond for a totally different reason - to disprove false claims made as part of a propaganda campain going on here. I hope you understand - if not - you are welcome to take the filtering advice, and if even that does not make you happy - I guess you will have to continue being unhappy. Cheers. On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:49 PM, <them.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > Innovative solution to all your problems, on both sides: stop discussing > politics on FD. I was under the impression this was supposed to be about > compsec, not alt.politics.middleeast. Doesn't matter who -is- right, from > here it looks like a bunch of kids using slightly more sophisticated > arguments. > > Understand? Someone is wrong on the internet, shocker, that one. You guys > aren't going to change each other's minds, so what you're doing is a waste > of time and lowering the noise to signal ratio. > > Grow up. > > Sent from my BlackBerry Smartphone provided by Alltel > > -----Original Message----- > From: ghost <gho...@gmail.com> > > Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:39:01 > To: Full Disclosure<full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk> > Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] The war in Palestine > > > The IDF would not release anything fake? LMAO! That takes the cake. > You're a propoganda shill. > > > On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Avraham Schneider > <avri.schnei...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The IDF released footage from a remote controlled spy aircarft, showing > > terrorists shooting from a UN building - experts have inspected the > footage > > and none have contested it. > > > > It's not that difficult to find out if it was fake or not - and > considering > > the IDF released it, they would not risk releasing anything fake, as it > > would be shooting itself in the foot. > > > > In general I agree, unless you can easily detect if the footage was fake > or > > not, videos on youtube are not reliable sources. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
