Well, but this doesn't seem to be a problem when it comes to lunatic errands of Andrew or Call's porn, so why would it bother to talk about security?
I want to read how you justify that stateful hardware is useless to check sessions of TCP and upper protocols. Of course, it doesn't protect from all kind of attacks and you cited some of these cases, but there are plenty of cases where it is useful. On Wed, 11 May 2011 09:29:24 +0000, Dobbins, Roland wrote: > On May 11, 2011, at 4:22 PM, phocean wrote: > >> So why going private? > > > Because full-disclosure isn't the best forum for a lengthy discussion > of this type. > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Roland Dobbins <rdobb...@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> > > The basis of optimism is sheer terror. > > -- Oscar Wilde > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
