The thread read Google vulnerabilities with PoC. From my understanding it was a RFI vulnerability on YouTube, and I voiced my support that this is a vulnerability.
I also explained a JSON Hijacking case as a follow up, and you said you didn't follow. So I am just saying that treating security that way, there are other parties like NSA who welcome them happily. --- lcam...@coredump.cx wrote: From: Michal Zalewski <lcam...@coredump.cx> To: timbra...@techemail.com Cc: M Kirschbaum <pr...@yahoo.co.uk>, full-disclosure <full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:47:19 -0700 > Is this treated with the same way that says that Remote File Inclusion is not > a security issue ? I'm not sure how RFI came into play on this thread - the original report wasn't about RFI. I don't have an agenda here; I'm just trying to get to the bottom of it and make sure that we converge on a common understanding of the issue. As in any argument, it's fairly likely that one of us is wrong, and I accept that it could very well be me - I have been wrong quite a few times in my life, and it's always a valuable learning opportunity. I think it's unfortunate that the thread has devolved into various accusations and credential-slinging, because it reduces the likelihood of such a productive outcome. Please feel free to ping me directly any time, though - I'm happy to chat. Cheers, /mz _____________________________________________________________ Are you a Techie? Get Your Free Tech Email Address Now! Visit http://www.TechEmail.com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
