Especially considering that all three use Tor to post on the list. I wonder why. Other header/content details can be interesting as well...
2014-03-17 10:24 GMT+01:00 Pedro Ribeiro <ped...@gmail.com>: > > On 16 Mar 2014 23:36, "T Imbrahim" <timbra...@techemail.com> wrote: >> >> The thread read Google vulnerabilities with PoC. From my understanding it >> was a RFI vulnerability on YouTube, and I voiced my support that this is a >> vulnerability. >> >> I also explained a JSON Hijacking case as a follow up, and you said you >> didn't follow. So I am just saying that treating security that way, there >> are other parties like NSA who welcome them happily. >> > > I think these guys - Alfred, Kirschbaum and Imbrahim are the OP's sock > puppets. > > They are all first time posters from unusual free email providers jumping to > defend the OP out of nowhere. If you search Google for their emails you only > find references to this thread. > > They present similar (false and /or incorrect) arguments, talk about their > extensive work experience, bash Google and its security team and send > repeated emails with exactly the same text. > > This is turning into a madhouse... I hope this guy doesn't have access to a > gun. > > Regards > Pedro > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
