On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 18:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > people who don't like what he reads can procmail him, or just get > > a life and think about it. after all, it's the contents not the > > packaging of what he says which is interesting... > Don't moderate morning_wood !!! look at all the advisories he's been > publishing, he keeps finding them, so why moderate him... > everyone is entitled to free speech and I for one, am glad he's posting..
Only now I started reading this thread (after deleting many emails). Is this full-disclosure or full-disclosure-but-only-after-some-moderation? If you cross that border, how can one really know wether we're really in a full-disclosure environment or that some posts may not be approved? Who checks for the the non-approved justice? No moderation, please, also in the best of the would-be-moderators. If you don't like someone, spamassassin, procmail et all can give you a hand. Don't substitute incompetence handling those tools with burocracy handled by 'others'. Where do I vote if not by stating my opposition in this email? Regards, Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
