Maybe the moderated list should be called Full Un-Disclosure or FUD. Oh... wait
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve > Sent: Thursday, 19 June 2003 2:01 a.m. > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Administrivia: Poll > > > On Friday 13 June 2003 12:54 pm, Andreas Gietl wrote: > >On Friday 13 June 2003 17:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >sounds good to me. This way we could keep all the questions out and > > just let "full disclosure" in. > > > >But i wonder if this may raise to legal problems for the moderators. > > Maybe sometimes a vendor comes to the solution the disclosure of a > > security vuln lead to damage. He may not get the "poster", but he > > will get the moderators. Since the moderators MUST read all posts, > > they will be responsible for the information that goes on > to the list > > and have to judge if the content is legal or not. So this would be > > kinnda hot .... > > Legal?!? > > Since when does the accurecy or availability of listings on > FD (or any > other list) constitute anything more than "For Your Info, but you > decide for yourself" postings? > > -- > > Steve Szmidt > V.P. Information Technology > Video Group Distributors, Inc. > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
