manohar singh wrote: > > Well, > > So far about a 100 emails on this subject (dcom.c), > and all this is doing is irritate everybody.
Well, normally I'd agree with you (although I wouldn't feel the need to post about it), but not this time. > Guys, this IS an unmoderated list, and people WILL > post exploits. Clear and simple. Let's just grow up, > and get back to work instead of cribbing in public > forums. There've been a lot of moronic statements made in this thread, true enough, but I've actually learned a couple of things here. It's been mostly interesting, strange though that may seem, including (I think it was Nick's) a reference to a site on locking down windows that I hadn't seen before. I dunno. It's a lot more interesting that having some fool complain about Mr. XSS (aka morning wood), and then quote the WHOLE damned post, so that those of us who have him quietly killfiled still get smacked with his sophomoric dribblings. I courteously removed the cc list, and I'm sure that those who were on it are grateful. Yes, I did indeed steal my new sig right out of Len's mouth. Too funny for words. Besides, Real Programmers used NOS/BE. -- Think of the joke sold to millions of people masquerading as an operating system coded by unemployed vms programmers, and visual basic "experts" instead. Full Disclosure - We believe in it. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html