Etaoin Shrdlu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There've been a lot of moronic statements made in this thread, true enough,
No there's a surprise... 8-) > but I've actually learned a couple of things here. It's been mostly > interesting, strange though that may seem, including (I think it was > Nick's) a reference to a site on locking down windows that I hadn't seen > before. I dunno. This one?? Minimizing Windows network services by Jean-Baptiste Marchand http://www.hsc.fr/ressources/breves/min_srv_res_win.en.html.en It is an excellent page for explaining stuff you will not (or at least that I had previously not been able to) find in the MS KnowledgeBase. Also, if you've read that page in the past, please note that it gets updated from time to time but its author seems to neglect updating the date near the top of the page. Despite that date currently reading "(02/09/2002)", and regardless of whether that is a US or "proper" format date, it is quite clearly outdated, as much further down the page you can read: Microsoft released on 4/16/2003 a new version of the rpccfg tool, that can list network interface indexes and configure interfaces restriction. This tool is available at http://download.microsoft.com/ (search keyword: rpccfg). So, if you find this page at all useful or interesting, revisit it occasionally (or add its URL to your favourite page-change alerting service, etc...). > It's a lot more interesting that having some fool complain about Mr. XSS > (aka morning wood), and then quote the WHOLE damned post, so that those of > us who have him quietly killfiled still get smacked with his sophomoric > dribblings. ... Surely you can't be serious... You don't hang in F-D for Mr XSS's every word? 8-) Regards, Nick FitzGerald _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
