[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > You wouldn't want us to be seen to "fuelling the problem" to ensure we > > have a job would you?? > > You're talking about an industry that sees fit to make the problem 3 to 4 > times worse by sending advertising spam (a.k.a "a virus was detected" notices) > back to the (almost always during the last 2-3 years) forged From: of the > mail, ...
That's a separate issue and one some of us are vert passionate about fixing -- e.g. http://www.f-prot.com/news/gen_news/open_letter_30jan2004.html _and_ which some of us are working to get fixed. > ... and that inflate their penis-extender "number of different viruses > detected" claims with things not prevalent enough in the wild to be a threat. That's a red herring -- it is many, many, MANY years since claimed detection numbers mattered much to anyone and that was a case of the technologists prevailing over the marketeers. > If anything, *not* fueling the problem to ensure you have a job would be > so out-of-character for the A/V industry that you'd probably be shunned > as a complete and total loon. And you know I'm not, how?? 8-) Regards, Nick FitzGerald _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
