Then you would have some static statement which covers the network in questions. PIX need some sort of translation for its ASA (Adaptive Security Algorithm) to work, so a "static" covers the network range would do...
-Antony -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cyril Guibourg Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 2:18 PM To: Otero, Hernan (EDS) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint "Otero, Hernan (EDS)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think you do, because at least a nat 0 itīs needed to get traffic passing > through the pix. This is odd, I do have a running config under 6.2 without any nat statement. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s and may contain confidential and privileged information.If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Visit us at http://www.cognizant.com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
