That is odd. You *must have some translations in place. Because you *must have (2) different subnets. ( One outside and another on the inside ) So when a packets transverses the pix and is sent outbound it must be translated - Nat inside / Outside or Nat 0 when using VPNs.
JP -----Original Message----- From: Cyril Guibourg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 1:18 PM To: Otero, Hernan (EDS) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint "Otero, Hernan (EDS)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think you do, because at least a nat 0 itīs needed to get traffic passing > through the pix. This is odd, I do have a running config under 6.2 without any nat statement. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
