> are you speaking for m$? Of course not, but I don't have the legal liability they have either and my dev staff is the staff of one so I can get to the people in the know rather quicker than MS. Plus I don't have to be politically correct and be nice about it.
> you know that "not able to comment" basically means "screwed" ? It does? I could think it means they talked to press people and they didn't want to just talk, they wanted to wait for someone who knew code could look into the issue. If the press person just quickly responded, someone would beat them for that as well. There are a lot of people out there that just like to beat on MS regardless of what is said. joe -----Original Message----- From: Georgi Guninski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 10:47 AM To: joe Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 09:28:08AM -0400, joe wrote: > Nod. Some knucklehead used GetTickCount or clock() for their app and > had no clue about datatypes and overflows and range of possible values > and some people go off on Windows. > joo, are you speaking for m$? the article clearly states: " Microsoft told Techworld it was aware of the reports but was not immediately able to comment." you know that "not able to comment" basically means "screwed" ? -- where do you want bill gates to go today? _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html