On Tue, 22 May 2007, Brian Loe wrote: > On 5/22/07, Fergie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >Security always comes at the expense of freedom. > > > > This is a common fallacy. > > > > I'd love to hear about a time that it wasn't true. > > In the context of this story, the people are giving up their privacy > (and to what extent they're giving it up is completely unkown) for the > "feeling" of security.
What? You mean, it's OK for the police to use full-size man-carrying helicopters, but not to use cheap toy ones? Perhaps you'd like to explain how one is an invasion of privacy and the other isn't? _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
