On Tue, 22 May 2007, Brian Loe wrote: > On 5/22/07, Drsolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 22 May 2007, Brian Loe wrote: > > > > > On 5/22/07, Drsolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > What? > > > > > > > > You mean, it's OK for the police to use full-size man-carrying > > > > helicopters, but not to use cheap toy ones? > > > > > > > > Perhaps you'd like to explain how one is an invasion of privacy and the > > > > other isn't? > > > > > > > > > First you'll need to fill me in on the dream you've just awakened from > > > then I'll do my best to analyze it for you. > > > > What? What? Is it morning already? > > > > > What the hell are you talking about? > > > > I'm talking about "Brit bobbies play with model airplanes while on the > > job". > > > > Okay, so what does that have to do with full-sized man-carrying choppers? > > Are you referring to the current use of real helicopters? I'm not > aware of such helicopters being used for surveillance in the private > sector
Private sector? Maybe this is a language thing, but to me, "private sector" means non-government. We could call government stuff "public sector". The police are very much public sector, and have been using helicopters for various purposes for a long time now. > - in the US or the UK. If they're doing so in the UK then I > guess these mini-choppers would be one hell of an improvement, > assuming their fuel is cheaper and flight times longer. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
