...or the boundlessness of sheer stupidity.

On 2/18/2010 11:29 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
> Never underestimate the arrogance of power.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org [mailto:funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org]
> On Behalf Of Joel Esler
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 2:56 PM
> To: Dan Kaminsky
> Cc: funsec; rmsl...@shaw.ca
> Subject: Re: [funsec] big brother at school
>
>
>
> And this is why I am not a lawyer I guess, cause I'm with Dan.  I can't
> think of any defense the lawyer would have.
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Dan Kaminsky<d...@doxpara.com>  wrote:
>
> "In loco parentis" tends to be pretty powerful, but you know what's
> even stronger?  Castle doctrine.  It wasn't just the kid that got
> violated, it wasn't even particularly the kid that got hit.  The
> school dropped a camera into the parent's home.
>
> "It's OK, I was just trying to secretly take pictures of your kid in
> his bedroom" isn't exactly the greatest defense the world has ever
> seen.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Benjamin Brown<optik...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Just something to chew on: A number of court decisions (press me
> harder and
>> I can search for the titles) rule in favor of the administration of
> public
>> schools in cases that would have otherwise been seen a pure violation
> of a
>> student's rights. These cases often invoke an argument of In loco
> parentis
>> for the administration. Though in every case I have read the rulings
>> concerned actions taken on school grounds or within close proximity.
> This
>> case involves school property (the laptop), but occurs at the students
> home.
>> I am curious how this shakes out and what the court ruling (and
> inevitable
>> appeal ruling) will say.
>>
>> My 2 dinars  =)
>> -Ben
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon&
>> Hannah<rmsl...@shaw.ca>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Date sent:              Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:28:13 -0600
>>> From:                   RandallM<randa...@fidmail.com>
>>>
>>>> http://www.boingboing.net/2010/02/17/school-used-student.html
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/02/18/24789.htm
>>>
>>> "A federal class action claims a suburban school district has been
> spying
>>> on
>>> students and families through the "indiscriminant use of and ability
> to
>>> remotely
>>> activate the webcams incorporated into each laptop issued to
> students,"
>>> without
>>> the knowledge or consent of students or parents. The named plaintiffs
> say
>>> they
>>> learned that Big Brother was in their home when an assistant
> principal
>>> told their
>>> son that the school district knew he `was engaged in improper
> behavior in
>>> his
>>> home, and cited as evidence a photograph from the webcam embedded in
> minor
>>> plaintiff's personal laptop issued by the school district.'"
>>>
>>> Always possible that the allegations are wrong or overstated, but, on
> the
>>> face of it,
>>> sounds like this school district could be in very serious trouble ...
>>>
>>> (Cue comments about protecting children, and being willing to give up
>>> personal
>>> freedoms for a worthy cause, etc ... )
>>>
>>> ======================  (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer)
>>> rsl...@vcn.bc.ca     sl...@victoria.tc.ca
> rsl...@computercrime.org
>>> What you ... call a poor signal-to-noise ratio is the 'glue' that
>>> holds a community together, that lets us recognize one another as
>>> people rather than roles.                            - Anton Aylward
>>> victoria.tc.ca/techrev/rms.htm
> blog.isc2.org/isc2_blog/slade/index.html
>>> http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/author/p1/
>>> http://twitter.com/NoticeBored http://twitter.com/rslade
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
>>> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
>>> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
>> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
>> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Reply via email to