> Is it in $VENDOR's interest to stop spammers? Absolutely not. If effective > and coordinated action was taken to stop (let's say) the top 100 spammers, > then spam levels would plunge dramatically and there would be much less > demand for $VENDOR's products. (I picked 100, because according to > Spamhaus, 100 known operations account for 80% of spam.)
What would you suggest a vendor do against a spammer? Sue? Bribe? Assault? I will admit that Xe Antispam Solutions has quite the ring to it. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
