Hi James,

Thanks for sharing your insights.

sigh...maybe I'm just getting old, being pragmatic, or selling out --
but my takeaway from this iPad/OR stuff is to patent a single-use iPad
sterile wrapping solution and sell the rights to a medical sterile
packaging company.

Considering the pervasive threat of nasties like MRSA [1] in medical
environments, a single-use sterile iPad bag would help mitigate the
most likely immediate threat to patient safety: dirty iPads crawling
with Staphylococcus Aureus.

ugh....i'm almost ashamed of myself ;)

Cheers,
--scm

[1]  http://www.cdc.gov/mrsa/

Cheers,
--scm

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:50, James Philput <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm in a similar situation.  We're currently rolling out security policies
> for tablet devices, and have been getting a lot of push back from the
> medical staff.  The thing that seems to be working here is a combination of
> policy and education.  We're allowing personal iPads to be used if the user
> agrees to let us install a basic security profile on the device.  The
> standard profile includes the usual wireless, email and VPN settings that we
> give to other remote users, but it also forces stronger passwords and a
> shorter idle screen lock.  Those settings, coupled with treating all of the
> iDevice/tablets as untrusted resources, have gone a long way toward making
> the things less of a security risk.
>
> We've been trying to plan for more consumer devices on the network.  It
> takes some effort and a bit more flexibility from a policy and procedure
> standpoint, but our willingness to work with the non-tech staff on this
> seems to have gained us a lot of good will.  The users are much more willing
> to listen to why we don't want them to do something rather than just trying
> to find ways to evade us.
>
> Regards,
> James
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Shawn Merdinger <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Phester,
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 20:50, phester <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Yeah, but it illustrates an universal issue. If users can't do what they
>> > want over the network, they'll find a way around it.
>>
>> Exactly.  This is great technology and enables medical pros to do more
>> for patients.
>>
>> But it's also worth mentioning that security people can expect a great
>> deal of pushback from medical pros when trying to assign the risk and
>> place limitations on these kind of consumer devices in a medical
>> environment -- and believe me, they can be a tough group of
>> articulate, forceful and powerful people to deal with.  As a lowly
>> network security monkey, I can vouch that it's no fun to go
>> head-to-head with with a MD with a Ph.D who brings in millions in
>> grants to the organization and wants to use his fancy iPad or iPhone
>> for medical work.
>>
>> And I would go even further in that the article mentions medical
>> schools like Stanford issuing iPads to incoming med students beginning
>> 2014.  So we can expect a entire new group of medical pros who expect
>> support and security with these devices.
>>
>> What's also interesting and a huge, undefined challenge is the
>> blending of these consumer devices into medical devices.  With the
>> addition of medical image viewing software on the iPad, that device
>> has now transitioned from a personal learning/entertainment platform
>> to a bona fide medical device, which opens up many more questions in
>> terms of organizational policy, data management/retention, and
>> regulatory requirements (HIPAA/HITECH, etc.).  After all, one can
>> jailbreak an iPad by visiting a website, clearly there are risks to
>> PHI on a iPad, no?
>>
>> Further compounding the issue are cloud applications, specifically the
>> growing use of personal cloud services like DropBox.  There's a great
>> deal of uncertainty as to the DropBox use with medical information and
>> regulatory requirements.  For more than a year on the DropBox forums,
>> folks have been going back and forth as to if this application meets
>> regulatory requirements.  But, as you note, people are going to do
>> what they want, and this is reinforced by DropBox making it way into
>> "Top 20 Lists" of apps for medical pros [1]
>>
>> And with medical pros not fully understanding how personal storage
>> cloud apps like DropBox actually work insofar as data retention and
>> flow, we are facing tremendous challenges.
>>
>> "When asked about security concerns with the iPad, especially if one
>> is left behind inadvertently, Dr. Feldman pointed out that as with
>> everything web-based, nothing is stored on the device." [2]
>>
>> From a vendor perspective, there are huge opportunities in this space
>> to provide workable security solutions for these kinds of devices and,
>> as Bruce Schneier writes, the "Consumerization and Corporate IT
>> Security" [3]  Bottom line is that we need these solutions to keep the
>> management folks happy with their regulatory compliance goals, and to
>> provide more assurance to network security guys like me who are
>> sweating bullets and worrying in the trenches as we face irate medical
>> pros with serious pull who expect us to not only secure these devices,
>> but also take on the liability risks of data loss.
>>
>> > Said hospitals need to find a way to provide function securely.
>> > Solutions
>> > are out there.
>>
>> You mention there are solutions out there.  I welcome further
>> discussion, either off-list or on-list.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> --scm
>>
>>
>> [1]
>>  http://www.imedicalapps.com/2010/12/bes-free-iphone-medical-apps-doctors-health-care-professionals/19/
>> [2]
>>  http://www.imedicalapps.com/2010/12/dropbox-osirix-ipad-radiology-images-operating-room/
>> [3]  http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/09/consumerization.html
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
>> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
>> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
>
>

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Reply via email to