>> is moving it's CPU design to Harvard Architecture > That's good. I could go for that. > (Developers might be a bit irked ...)
Real Harvard architecture is sufficiently annoying to develop for that I suspect the first thing that would be done with a true Harvard machine would be the creation of some kind of pcode engine that was effectively von Neumann. Indeed, that's approximately how many modern CPUs work - we just call the pcode engine implementation "microcode". /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML [email protected] / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
