Dan, Although if that guy wanted a gun to shoot people, even if there werent' any in the US, he would have found an illegal one to do so...
Everything else I agree with you and you are absolutely 100% correct my friend! :-) Mike B Michael P. Blanchard Senior Security Engineer, CISSP, GCIH, CCSA-NGX, MCSE Cyber Security Services EMC ² Corporation 32 Coslin Drive Southboro, MA 01772 Office: (508)898-7102 Cell: (508)958-2780 email: [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: Dan White [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 2:58 PM To: Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec) Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: Sandy Hook On 12/14/12 19:36 +0000, Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec) wrote: >Gun control would not have prevented this, not at all, not one tiddly >bit.... a criminal would have found a way.... could have easily parked a >truck full of explosives near the school too.... > >I'll bet it could have been lessened if some teachers were allowed to >carry though, yes. That's not exactly fair. If he didn't have a gun, he would have been unlikely to kill very many people. If he didn't have a gun, but the school had an armed security guard, there probably would have been a much different outcome. Something as simple as locking the front door (like some preschools do) might have helped. I would not enroll my children in a school that armed teachers. period. This is not something with an easy fix, or it would have been tried. Taking away guns from law abiding citizens who just want to defend themselves ain't gonna happen (in the US). My philosophy when it comes to protecting my family: figure out where all the crazy people are, and be somewhere else. -- Dan White _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
