Deterrent-based controls probably are most effective against people who aren't extremely deviant/troubled. I believe that most murderers probably aren't considering the penalty in a rational way when committing the crime. On Dec 15, 2012 2:56 PM, "Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec)" < [email protected]> wrote:
> Exactly... Llike this maggot that shot the school.... If he didn't > shoot himself, he would have spent the rest of his life in prison.... > Even though, there isn't a shadow of a doubt he is the killer. > > Cases like that should be automatic death.... Might I even say, death > by the method the victim's family chooses too! Even if that is death by > fireants... His victims didn't have a choice, why should these maggots > have any choice in the matter.... Again, for zero doubt, multiple > witnesses killings.... Others we can try in a court, but then still get > death if found guilty.... > > Hell, bring back public town square hangings... What more of a > deterrent there is than that? > > Mike B > > Mike B > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jeffrey Walton [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 05:39 PM > To: Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec) > Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [funsec] Sandy Hook > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Oh, but I do not disagree that police officers and others similiar > (doctors > > too) should undergo pych evals as part of the application process... Not > > because of the gun they carry, but because of people in general will > look up > > to and look to these people for advise andwell being... They can cause > much > > more harm with words than guns ever will.... > Absolutely. > > I'm not a fan of the Death Penalty, but I could never understand why > there are not laws that automatically trigger the sentence for public > officials and servants (similar to what we have with criminals). > Remember, this is supposed to be a good deterrent. It might of helped > with, for example, Antoinette Frank. > > Jeff > > > From: Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec) > > Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 05:27 PM > > To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' > > <[email protected]> > > Cc: '[email protected]' <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [funsec] Sandy Hook > > > > I would feel that doctors, lawyers, train/bus drivers, truck drivers, etc > > would all have to undergo the same psych eval.... As they ALL cause more > > deaths per year than gun owners........and we can't forget automobile > > drivers too! > > > > Mike B > > > > From: Joel Esler [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 09:41 AM > > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [funsec] Sandy Hook > > > > They do. At least all the family members I have that are cops have had > > to/have to. > > > > -- > > Joel Esler > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On Dec 14, 2012, at 5:25 PM, Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Dan White <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 12/14/2012 14:57, Dan White wrote: > > > > > > .... > > > > > > It may be a bit easier for me in Oklahoma to find the crazy people, since > > > > a law allowing citizens to openly carry handguns has recently gone into > > > > effect. I can say, without hesitation, that the average private citizen > > > > openly carrying a firearm is going to be a great deal crazier than the > > > > average citizen. > > > > Would that include off-duty police officers? > > > > I've always argued folks given a gun for a living should have to go > > through psychological evaluation and maintain good mental health. New > > Orleans and Baltimore police departments are a case study. > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
