All,
         The error Matt is mentioning is directly related to the file 
access table updates that I mentioned in the previous version 
release.  Furthur writes data to a temp file, and sometimes tries to access 
that data immediately after it's written.  While most computers are fast 
enough to get the FAT table updated in time, Furthur needs to make sure the 
file system is ready before it reads the data.  (Actually I'm not sure it's 
totally processor dependant, I think it may have something to do with the 
OS too.)
         The current version has the fix for when Furthur tries to assemble 
a completed file, but the 505 is the same error when Furthur tries to 
forward received data on to another host.  The new version (when released) 
will perform the same check to insure the data is ready.  You're probably 
best off waiting for the new version if you're running into this problem, 
but I only know of a couple folks who are.
         - Jamie

P.S.  Notice my correct spelling of "received".  I actually developed this 
system for over six months until it finally dawned on me that I had spelled 
this word wrong everywhere.  (Not just in the user interface, but in 
hundreds of places in the code.)  If anyone notices any more spelling or 
grammer errors in the GUI, please let me know, as this would certaintly 
qualify as a bug.  (The kind of bug I like to fix.)




At 02:43 AM 10/11/2001 -0500, Matt Annen wrote:
>Seems I can download a set for maybe 10 minutes and it aborts, complaining 
>that I should try again later.  If I resume right away it starts up again, 
>not really getting to resume where it left off (the progress percentage 
>starts over at zero).  I am constantly getting this error message, and 
>have yet to get a single file completed other than an md5 or text file 
>after 11 hours of uptime.  Anyone know what's up?  Very frustrating


------------ [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] ------------ 
           The Furthur Development List
    Questions, Comments: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            http://cyberial.com/furthur
--------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to