I could sure go for some standardized prefixes for subjects. Stuff like OT:
for off-topic; SUG: for suggestions for Fusebox spec, etc. I don't know if
it would catch on or not, but it would be nice.
Hal Helms
== See www.ColdFusionTraining.com for info on "Best Practices with
ColdFusion & Fusebox" training, Jan 22-25 ==
-----Original Message-----
From: John Foulds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 12:55 PM
To: Fusebox
Subject: How to save this list
This list is crazy again. Almost 200 messages during the past workweek.
How anyone can find time to stay on top of it is beyond me.
Three facts:
(1) 200+ messages this 5-day workweek
(2) Fusebox's own unadvertised growth rate
(3) A new marketing push (ie. tech magazines)
I'm not an apocolyptic doomsayer (the subject line was just a teaser), but
it sure would be nice if someone would find a method to manage the infoglut
here.
I can think of a few possibilities (sublists, or a subject header scheme),
but regardless, they all center around clustering postings categorically.
Although what exactly those categories are, is for a far fatter brain than
mine.
I would just like to be more efficient in getting information from, and
sharing information with, other Fuseboxers.
It's getting very hard to do that given the traffic, and it appears though
it's only going to get worse.
John Foulds
Ottawa, Canada
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
