How about putting it in a WDDX structure, encrypting the structure, then 
if you find a fuseaction=decrypt in the query_string you would pull it 
out of the WDDX packet?
I found a tag in Developer exchange that encrypts WDDX or objects as 
well by ALEX KUZNETSKY that I am looking at right now. . . .to overcome 
this limitation, cause I just ran into it.

This should be easy to implement . . . gotta lova all those CF functions 
and structures they built for us to use.

McCollough, Alan wrote:

> I looked into this, but the size of a URLEncrypted string grows pretty
> quick. You can quickly hit the 2K limit that some webservers have, to
> prevent buffer overload attacks. Its pretty easy to overload a URL string.
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:        Joseph Higgins [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent:        Tuesday, March 27, 2001 9:32 AM
>> To:  Fusebox
>> Subject:     FormURL2Attributes
>> 
>> Has anyone implemented encrypting the query string and parsing the 
>> partially encrypted query_string back into attributes scoped variables 
>> in a private version in their Form2URLAttributes. I think this could go 
>> along with a security part of the tag for sights that do not need 
>> indexing or url hacks.
>> 
>> This is what I am thinking, use a custom tag to a cflocate:
>> <cf_urlcrypt
>>    in = "fuseaction=members.authenticate&member_id=1">
>> 
>> the output would be a string like this:
>>    index.cfm?fuseaction=decrypt&M%3BJR%2F%40%2020%2AIZ%26%0A=A
>>   
>> Formurl2Attributes would then internally say - hey I need to decrypt 
>> this string. I need to lop off the "=A" on the end and 
>> "index.cfm?fuseaction=decrypt&" on the front. Then decrypt that value, 
>> and parse the url string into attributes scope.
>> 
>> I am going to write this today for my own use, and if any of you are 
>> willing to share please do, of course it will be a modification to the 
>> tag but I will make mine so it will not break.
>> 
>> Shawn Regan wrote:
>> 
>>> Not sure if I read an email correctly yesterday. But did someone mention
>> 
>> the
>> 
>>> total rewriting of the FormURL2Attributes.cfm? If so how will this
>> 
>> impact
>> 
>>> the use of this new FormURL2Attributes.cfm with old fusebox apps? will
>> 
>> these
>> 
>>> apps need to be redone if we wish to use this new FormURL2Attributes.cfm
>>> with them?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Shawn Regan
>>> Applications Developer
>>> Pacific Technology Solutions 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to