One of the things we need to not lose sight of, is that Fusebox IS NOT ONLY a ColdFusion development methodology. When we add functionality, we have other languages we also need to add a similar functionality for.
-----Original Message----- From: John Farrar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 7:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ColdFusionMX & Fusebox ?? A better question... I have heard many developers resist adding features to fusebox. You would think standard features like a system menu, a message box, a requestor, a grid container would hold back development. Boy... visual basic and windows did not prove that to be so. It wasn't so on Mac or the Amiga. It doesn't seem to be the case on Linux. Hmmm.... my question. What are we going to do with fusebox? Are we going to target the lowest common denominator and have fusebox be the least it can be? OR Are we going to make fusebox a system with features developers can use... but they don't have to. Ship with features like framemode on/or/off. There has been many fine developments that could be a part of the system without them requiring the developer to use all the features. My suggestion is along with MX... let's make fusebox more robust!!! John Farrar ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
