-- Topica Digest --
Re: Re: Mind Mapper or Visual Mind?
By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Re: Mind Mapper or Visual Mind?
By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: Mind Mapper or Visual Mind?
By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trees
By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Techspedition Article Needed
By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cfmodule and anchors
By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: cfmodule and anchors
By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FB3 Help
By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FB3 Help
By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cfmodule and anchors
By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cfmodule and anchors
By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 11:53:30 -0400
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Re: Mind Mapper or Visual Mind?
Another plus for MindMapper, you can distribute your mindmaps bundled with a free
viewer which can be downloaded from:
http://www.mindmapper.de/English/viewere.html
Aroop Ghosh
>
> From: Jeff Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2002/06/29 Sat PM 05:22:21 EST
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Mind Mapper or Visual Mind?
>
> Fuseminder works equally well with Visual Mind and MindMapper. Here's a
> clue, though--MindMapper 3 does XML export. This might give you some
> indication as to where the future of Fuseminder is headed...
>
> - Jeff
>
> On 28 Jun 2002 at 14:21, Stacy Young wrote:
>
> >
> > Which are ya using?...and do both have export/import utilities for FB related
>development? I
> > believe there's fuseminder for VM...anything for Mind Mapper?
> >
> >
> > Stacy Young
> > System Integration Specialist, Architecture
> > Surefire Commerce
> > http://www.sfcommerce.com
> > (p) 514-380-2700 ext: 3234
> > (f) 514-380-2760
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > AVIS IMPORTANT:
> > -------------------------------
> > Les informations contenues dans le present document et ses
> > pieces jointes sont strictement confidentielles et reservees a
> > l'usage de la (des) personne(s) a qui il est adresse. Si vous
> > n'etes pas le destinataire, soyez avise que toute divulgation,
> > distribution, copie, ou autre utilisation de ces informations
> > est strictement prohibee. Si vous avez recu ce document par
> > erreur, veuillez s'il vous plait communiquer immediatement avec
> > l'expediteur et detruire ce document sans en faire de copie sous
> > quelque forme.
> >
> > WARNING:
> > -------------------------------
> > The information contained in this document and attachments is
> > confidential and intended only for the person(s) named above. If
> > you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that
> > any disclosure, copying, distribution, or any other use of the
> > information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> > document by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and
> > destroy this document and attachments without making any copy of
> > any kind.
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 12:26:57 -0400
From: "Ken Beard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Re: Mind Mapper or Visual Mind?
visual mind does .exe exports, no viewer needed.
ken
-----Original Message-----
From: Aroop Ghosh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 11:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: Mind Mapper or Visual Mind?
Another plus for MindMapper, you can distribute your mindmaps bundled with a
free viewer which can be downloaded from:
http://www.mindmapper.de/English/viewere.html
Aroop Ghosh
>
> From: Jeff Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2002/06/29 Sat PM 05:22:21 EST
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Mind Mapper or Visual Mind?
>
> Fuseminder works equally well with Visual Mind and MindMapper. Here's a
> clue, though--MindMapper 3 does XML export. This might give you some
> indication as to where the future of Fuseminder is headed...
>
> - Jeff
>
> On 28 Jun 2002 at 14:21, Stacy Young wrote:
>
> >
> > Which are ya using?...and do both have export/import utilities for FB
related development? I
> > believe there's fuseminder for VM...anything for Mind Mapper?
> >
> >
> > Stacy Young
> > System Integration Specialist, Architecture
> > Surefire Commerce
> > http://www.sfcommerce.com
> > (p) 514-380-2700 ext: 3234
> > (f) 514-380-2760
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > AVIS IMPORTANT:
> > -------------------------------
> > Les informations contenues dans le present document et ses
> > pieces jointes sont strictement confidentielles et reservees a
> > l'usage de la (des) personne(s) a qui il est adresse. Si vous
> > n'etes pas le destinataire, soyez avise que toute divulgation,
> > distribution, copie, ou autre utilisation de ces informations
> > est strictement prohibee. Si vous avez recu ce document par
> > erreur, veuillez s'il vous plait communiquer immediatement avec
> > l'expediteur et detruire ce document sans en faire de copie sous
> > quelque forme.
> >
> > WARNING:
> > -------------------------------
> > The information contained in this document and attachments is
> > confidential and intended only for the person(s) named above. If
> > you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that
> > any disclosure, copying, distribution, or any other use of the
> > information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> > document by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and
> > destroy this document and attachments without making any copy of
> > any kind.
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 12:45:14 -0400
From: "ecd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Re: Mind Mapper or Visual Mind?
i'm not opening a random .exe
ecd
<feel free to snip>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Beard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:26 PM
Subject: RE: Re: Mind Mapper or Visual Mind?
| visual mind does .exe exports, no viewer needed.
| ken
|
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Aroop Ghosh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 11:54 AM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: Re: Mind Mapper or Visual Mind?
|
|
|
| Another plus for MindMapper, you can distribute your mindmaps bundled with
a
| free viewer which can be downloaded from:
|
| http://www.mindmapper.de/English/viewere.html
|
| Aroop Ghosh
|
|
| >
| > From: Jeff Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > Date: 2002/06/29 Sat PM 05:22:21 EST
| > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > Subject: Re: Mind Mapper or Visual Mind?
| >
| > Fuseminder works equally well with Visual Mind and MindMapper. Here's a
| > clue, though--MindMapper 3 does XML export. This might give you some
| > indication as to where the future of Fuseminder is headed...
| >
| > - Jeff
| >
| > On 28 Jun 2002 at 14:21, Stacy Young wrote:
| >
| > >
| > > Which are ya using?...and do both have export/import utilities for FB
| related development? I
| > > believe there's fuseminder for VM...anything for Mind Mapper?
| > >
| > >
| > > Stacy Young
| > > System Integration Specialist, Architecture
| > > Surefire Commerce
| > > http://www.sfcommerce.com
| > > (p) 514-380-2700 ext: 3234
| > > (f) 514-380-2760
| > >
| > >
| > >
| > >
| > > AVIS IMPORTANT:
| > > -------------------------------
| > > Les informations contenues dans le present document et ses
| > > pieces jointes sont strictement confidentielles et reservees a
| > > l'usage de la (des) personne(s) a qui il est adresse. Si vous
| > > n'etes pas le destinataire, soyez avise que toute divulgation,
| > > distribution, copie, ou autre utilisation de ces informations
| > > est strictement prohibee. Si vous avez recu ce document par
| > > erreur, veuillez s'il vous plait communiquer immediatement avec
| > > l'expediteur et detruire ce document sans en faire de copie sous
| > > quelque forme.
| > >
| > > WARNING:
| > > -------------------------------
| > > The information contained in this document and attachments is
| > > confidential and intended only for the person(s) named above. If
| > > you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that
| > > any disclosure, copying, distribution, or any other use of the
| > > information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
| > > document by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and
| > > destroy this document and attachments without making any copy of
| > > any kind.
| >
| >
| >
| >
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 02:51:47 +0000
From: Ian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Trees
I am working with some modified tree queries from secretagents and am
running into a problem. If I build the entire tree, I get the proper
indentations. If I try to display only one branch, the tree structure
flattens. Can anyone tell me what is wrong with this query?
Thanks,
Ian
SELECT
Child.TextTree_Fk,
Child.TextName,
Count(Child.StartBranch) as LVL,
Child.StartBranch,
Child.EndBranch
FROM
V_TextTree as Parent,
V_TextTree as Child
WHERE
Child.StartBranch
BETWEEN
Parent.StartBranch AND Parent.EndBranch
AND
parent.StartBranch = @TextTree_Pk
GROUP BY
Child.StartBranch,
Child.TextTree_Fk,
Child.TextName,
Child.EndBranch
ORDER BY
Child.StartBranch
catholicliturgy.com
catholicstore.com
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 23:23:56 -0500
From: Chris Montgomery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Techspedition Article Needed
Howdy Lee,
Saturday, June 29, 2002, 11:17:52 PM, Lee Borkman wrote:
> Sorry to trample your expectations, Chris, but the book from Techspedition is
> about bog-standard FB3. Don't get your hopes up about finding any FuseQ info
> there.
Well, I look forward to getting it and reading it anyway. Thanks for
clarifying this, though.
> We are *all* looking forward to reading that article on FuseQ and
> error-handling - that's the bit that sounds particularly interesting to me.
> Fusium's core has been specially extended for the specific purpose of handling
> errors nicely. It will be interesting to see if FuseQ, which is a more general
> extension, can be used to handle errors as cleanly.
That's also why I look forward to reading the article.
> See ya,
> LeeBB
> ps, my first thought on trying to read the FuseQ/error-handling article and
> getting a nice error message instead was that it was just John's unique sense of
> humour shining through, as ever. I'm still not convinced that this first
> impression was incorrect ;-) Like the old joke, How do you keep an idiot in
> suspense?...
That's about the conclusion I've come to ... knowing John's wicked
sense of humor, me thinks he's just pulling our string. :)
--
Chris Montgomery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Airtight Web Services http://www.airtightweb.com
Web Development, Web Project Management, Software Sales
210-490-3249/888-745-7603
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 15:12:34 +0800
From: "Kay Smoljak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: cfmodule and anchors
Is this even possible?
I'm calling a fuseaction with cfmodule - but I'd like to specify an
anchor within the display page.
<cfmodule template="#self#" fuseaction="nice.display##myAnchor" is not
working, not surprisingly, as display#myAnchor is not a fuseaction in
the "nice" circuit. I can't think of anything else.
Can anyone think of a way to fudge this funationality any other way?
Thanks,
Kay.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 17:20:23 +1000
From: BORKMAN Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: cfmodule and anchors
Well, Kay,
You could write your module (ie your Fusebox app) so that it accepts an
anchor attribute:
<cfmodule template="#self#" fuseaction="nice.display" anchor="myanchor">
Of course, I don't know what your app could possibly *DO* with that
information, unless it's going to CFLOCATION to a new URL. Can you display
the page and then CFLOCATION to an anchor within it? Never tried *that* one
before, sounds like fun.
More later, I'm actualy *working* today ;-(
Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: Kay Smoljak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Is this even possible?
I'm calling a fuseaction with cfmodule - but I'd like to specify an
anchor within the display page.
<cfmodule template="#self#" fuseaction="nice.display##myAnchor" is not
working, not surprisingly, as display#myAnchor is not a fuseaction in
the "nice" circuit. I can't think of anything else.
Can anyone think of a way to fudge this funationality any other way?
Thanks,
Kay.
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
This e-mail and any attachment to it is intended only to be read or used by
the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
mistaken transmission to you. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not
disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
recipient. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to
this e-mail or attachment to it.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 01:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Manan Mehra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FB3 Help
Hello
I had one doubt after goin thru the examples
and documentation i came accross for FB3. If some
could clearify, it would be gr8. It is :-
--- For child circuits, how are the fuseactions
parsed, as FBX_Fusebox_CFxx.cfm file is in home
circuit only. Are all fuseaction for child circuits
resolved in FBX_Fusebox_CFxx.cfm of home circuit.
Thanx
-Manan
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 18:10:14 +1000
From: BORKMAN Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: FB3 Help
Yes, that's right, Manan. The fbx_fusebox_ file (ie the FB3 "core" file) in
the *home* circuit handles everything. It will:
* read it's own directory's fbx_circuits file:
* drill down through the circuits, executing fbx_settings at every level,
until it reaches the target circuit
* execute the fbx_switch (ie the fuseaction)
* step back up through the circuits again, adding the layouts
* until it reaches the home circuit again, and outputs the results to the
server/browser.
Pheww! Does that help?
LeeBB
-----Original Message-----
From: Manan Mehra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Hello
I had one doubt after goin thru the examples
and documentation i came accross for FB3. If some
could clearify, it would be gr8. It is :-
--- For child circuits, how are the fuseactions
parsed, as FBX_Fusebox_CFxx.cfm file is in home
circuit only. Are all fuseaction for child circuits
resolved in FBX_Fusebox_CFxx.cfm of home circuit.
Thanx
-Manan
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
This e-mail and any attachment to it is intended only to be read or used by
the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
mistaken transmission to you. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not
disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
recipient. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to
this e-mail or attachment to it.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 12:27:33 +0200
From: Erki Esken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: cfmodule and anchors
Anchors are a browser thing not server-side script thing.
If you want the browser to scroll to some specific place you must
define the anchor name in URL and use <a name="whatever"/> in the
doc, or you can also do it with some javascript magic.
.erki
> Is this even possible?
>
> I'm calling a fuseaction with cfmodule - but I'd like to specify an
> anchor within the display page.
>
> <cfmodule template="#self#" fuseaction="nice.display##myAnchor" is not
> working, not surprisingly, as display#myAnchor is not a fuseaction in
> the "nice" circuit. I can't think of anything else.
>
> Can anyone think of a way to fudge this funationality any other way?
>
> Thanks,
> Kay.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 12:39:59 +0200
From: Erki Esken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: cfmodule and anchors
> If you want the browser to scroll to some specific place you must
> define the anchor name in URL and use <a name="whatever"/> in the
> doc, or you can also do it with some javascript magic.
Just tried this out and it seems to work OK in IE 5.5, Opera 6 and
Mozilla 1.0. Server access logs showed that document is only
requested once -- so browsers are smart enough not to reload the
doc, but just jump to anchor in that same page.
Here's the code:
<html>
<head>
<script>
function jump(anchorName) {
document.location = document.location + '#' + anchorName;
}
</script>
</head>
<body onload="jump('test');">
...lots of text...
<a name="test"/>
...lots of text...
</body>
</html>
So you could stick the anchor name where to jump into a variable in
some circuit's settings of switch file and use that variable with onload
attribute in the layout file that outputs <body> tags.
.erki
------------------------------
End of [EMAIL PROTECTED] digest, issue 847
