Hi, On 23/01/2014 10:55, Sylvain Beucler - Inria wrote: > Hi, > > [by advance, sorry if I'm feeding a venerable troll ;)] > > As far as I understand, the Debian packaging was maintained in a Bzr > repository back from when FF was using SVN. > I would rather say that when we started to switch to git, debian packaging went in bzr. And it was some will to separate debian packaging from the rest of the code. > Now FF switched to Git, and I've found in painful in the past months > to use Bzr. The initial checkout was pretty huge and slow, it requires > new contributors to understand both Git and Bzr, and we can't use > optimizations (like having a single working directory pulling from > both repos). > (Plus, at Inria I've even seen the Bzr repository converted back to > Git, meaning pulling changes from the FF Git master is nearly > impossible ;)) > > So what do you think about migrating fusionforge-deb-packaging to Git? > Personnally I would prefer git-only, as I didn't look yet how to deal with contributing in bzr part As i have some plan for common plugin with one of our sourceforge cousin who switched to git, it's another 'in favor of git'.
Cheers Christian > Cheers! > Sylvain > > > _______________________________________________ > Fusionforge-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fusionforge.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fusionforge-general _______________________________________________ Fusionforge-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fusionforge.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fusionforge-general
