Arthur, When you respond to people's reasonably supported theories around the most corrupt government in US history, whether or not you find any credibility therein, with trivializing and belittling one-liners, then further direct people to draw comparisons to unrelated tripe, you utterly fail to soften or diffuse your underlying disdain.
I'd prefer to see you take a stand, and back it up, than to have you release this insulting dribble that is as provocative as was Harry's remark. Harry used this favorite incendiary topic to deflect heat from himself. But the 9/11 topic is more than relevant to this list for all that has been and continues to be affected by its economic and emotional impact. That you ridicule the significance of conspiracy theories in the face of admissions by the White House of fabricated intelligence, let alone the daily reports of misconduct, secrecy and criminal actions within its far reaching authority, reveals a naive trust in US GOP's intentions and integrity. Natalia Cordell, Arthur: ECOM wrote: >http://skepdic.com/pareidol.html > >You may want to review some of the material re: seeing the face of the >Virgin Mary just about everywhere in just about everything. > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christoph >Reuss >Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 5:37 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [Futurework] WTC was hit by a Military Jet > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ri7rZ6Bi6C8 > >Harry, who needs conspiracy theories when reality says it all? > >Chris > > > >_______________________________________________ >Futurework mailing list >Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca >http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework > >_______________________________________________ >Futurework mailing list >Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca >http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework > > > _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
