Karen, Clearly, I misunderstood; when you wrote "I agree that...." I misinterpreted that to mean that you were agreeing with me about Gopnik--
In any case, it certainly isn't a problem. I think many of the suggestions were very interesting if not particularly doable. Selma ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karen Watters Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Selma Singer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 12:24 PM Subject: RE: [Futurework] Visions of the Science of Tomorrow > Selma, I was referring to Sheldrake's and Lloyd's suggestions. Sorry that I > did not make that clear. Karen > Karen, > Perhaps we interpreted Alison Gopnik differently but I understood her to be > talking about the importance of taking care of our very young children in > order to secure our future. I didn't think she was talking about > popularizing science. > > It's always interesing, isn't it, the way we all interpret things > differently. > Selma > > Selma, thanks for posting this. Playstation Professor and Intellectual > Globalization are my favorites from this list, but agree that Science needs > to become more 'popular' and open to the public. > Karen > > Selma wrote: Of course I like Gopnik's suggestion. > Today's Visions of the Science of Tomorrow, January 4, 2003 @ > http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/04/opinion/04EDGE.html?ex=1042689722&ei=1&en= > fc2bfcb3afb63023 > > _______________________________________________ > > Futurework mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework > > > _______________________________________________ > Futurework mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
